Vietnamese EFL Students’ Perception of Utilizing Facebook Basic Features for Learning English Vocabulary

International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS)
© 2024 by IJSMS Journal
Volume-7 Issue-4
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Vo Phuong Dong
DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i4p105
MLA Style: Vo Phuong Dong "Vietnamese EFL Students’ Perception of Utilizing Facebook Basic Features for Learning English Vocabulary" International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) V7.I4 (2024):43-51.

APA Style: Vo Phuong Dong, Vietnamese EFL Students’ Perception of Utilizing Facebook Basic Features for Learning English Vocabulary, International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), v7(i4), 43-51.
As the most widely used second language (Broughton et al., 1981), English has become very important in many fields of life. The number of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students has ballooned, going hand in hand with the greater demand for English vocabulary learning tools, especially social media platforms such as Facebook. This study was conducted to explore Vietnamese EFT students' perceptions of utilizing Facebook's basic features for learning English vocabulary by a quantitative study. A total of 120 English major students, from freshman to senior, from a university in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam participated in this study. The results indicated that most EFL students regarded Facebook as an effective tool for English vocabulary learning by providing social learning, community of practice and education environment. Its challenges and limitations were also shown, focusing on distractions and negative content on Facebook.
Keywords: Perceptions, vocabulary learning, Facebook’s basic features, Facebook as an effective tool.
[1] Akin, A., & Seferoğlu, G. (2004). The effectiveness of vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_04_aa.php
[2] American Psychological Association. (2009). How technology changes everything (and nothing) in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(5), 454–463.
[3] Annamalai, N. (2017). Exploring students' use of Facebook in formal learning contexts. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 2(2), 91-106.
[4] Ayuningtyas, P. (2018). WhatsApp: Learning on the go. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.629
[5] Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.). Psychology Press.
[6] Bailey, N., Park, J., & Haji, M. H. (2017). Social network platforms in foreign language learning and acquisition: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1260896
[7] Bani-Hani, N. A., Al-Sobh, M. A., & Abu-Melhim, A. R. H. (2014). Utilizing Facebook groups in teaching writing: Jordanian EFL students' perceptions and attitudes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 27.
[8] Barak, N. (2014, December 22). The worst social media blunders of 2014. New York Post. Available at http://nypost.com/ 2014/12/22/ the-worst- social-media -blunders- of-2014/ (accessed on 28 December 2014).
[9] Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
[10] Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2010). The most preferred social network sites by students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5864-5869.
[11] Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 247-256.
[12] Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17-28. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_09/article02.htm
[13] Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24-43.
[14] Bloch, J. (2008). A conceptual framework for the integration of Facebook into ESL writing classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(10), 1-10. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Bloch-Facebook.html
[15] Bosch, T. E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communicatio, 35(2), 185-200.
[16] Broughton, G., et al. (1981). Teaching English as a foreign language. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
[17] Bruton, A. (2007). Vocabulary learning with a business English corpus: Exploring the potential of concordance-based materials. Language Awareness, 16(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.2167/la345.0
[18] Cheung, C. M. K., & Vogel, D. (2011). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
[19] Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2011). Can Facebook enhance the communications between teachers and students? The International Journal of Learning, 17(11), 385-397.
[20] Clark, C., & Rumbold, K. (2006). Reading for Pleasure: A Research Overview. National Literacy Trust.
[21] Çoklar, A. N. (2012). Evaluations of students on Facebook as an educational environment. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 42–53.
[22] Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, 12(2), 113-124.
[23] Council, B. (2013). The English Effect: The Impact of English, What it’s Worth to the UK and Why it Matters to the World. British Council.
[24] Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education International.
[25] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
[26] Dizon, G. (2015). Japanese students’ attitudes towards the use of Facebook in the EFL classroom. The Language Teacher, 39(5), 9-14.
[27] Dodigovic, M. (2005). CALL glossing in action: Developing an operational model for the analysis of the glossing effect on L2 text comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500171959
[28] Erten, I. H., & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 1-22. Retrieved from https://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/erten-tekim
[29] Espinosa, S. (2015). Using Facebook as a platform for learning English in Saudi Arabia: A social presence theory perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 729-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9385-6
[30] Facebook. (2015). Company Info | Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://newsroom.f.com/company-info/
[31] Fithriani, R., Dewi, U., Daulay, S. H., Salmiah, M., & Fransiska, W. (2019). Using Facebook in EFL writing class: Its effectiveness from students’ perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 634-645.
[32] Fodeman, D., & Monroe, M. (2009). The impact of Facebook on our students. Teacher Librarian, 36(5), 36−40.
[33] Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Newbury House Publishers.
[34] Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469-483.
[35] Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing collaborative learning environments using educational social networking sites: A study of the effects of teaching strategies on student perceptions and social presence. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.002
[36] Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 4-11.
[37] Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Hanson, E., Whittle, H. C., & Beech, A. R. (2017). Everyone deserves to be happy and safe: A mixed methods study exploring how online and offline child sexual abuse impact young people and how professionals respond to it. NSPCC.
[38] Haverback, H. R. (2009). Engaging students through social media: Evidence-based practices for use in student affairs. The Journal of Technology in Student Affairs, 11(2), 1-14. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/17949
[39] Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221.
[40] Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.
[41] Johnson, D. (2010). Taming the chaos. Learning and Leading with Technology, 38(3), 20–23.
[42] Judd, T. (2010). Facebook use in the classroom: Time for teachers to reconsider? International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 51-65.
[43] Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132.
[44] Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
[45] Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
[46] Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
[47] Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.
[48] Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning. New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
[49] Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 175-185.
[50] Lindsay, D., & Davis, R. (2013). A guide to the new digital communication tools. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 9(1), 1-11.
[51] Liu, F., & Shi, J. (2007). An empirical study on integrating the use of mobile phones into college English teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 275-286.
[52] Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17.
[53] McBride, K. (2009). Social-networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for recreation. Learning and Leading with Technology, 37(2), 8-11.
[54] McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Memory (encoding, storage, retrieval). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, 1, 549-554.
[55] Mills, K. A. (2011). The multiliteracies classroom. Multiliteracies: Theory and practice, 3(4), 25-40.
[56] Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Prentice Hall.
[57] Oral, B. (2013). Investigating the relationship between Facebook and the academic performance of university students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9284-4
[58] Pew Research Center. (2013). Social media update 2013. Retrieved January 1, 2014, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
[59] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/ writing/ Prensky%20-%20 Digital%20Natives, %20Digital%20 Immigrants%20 -%20Part1.pdf
[60] Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Carrier, L. M. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. Palgrave Macmillan.
[61] Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning – A critical review. Communications of the ACM, 50(6), 74-79.
[62] Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845.
[63] Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528-546.
[64] Tynes, B. M. (2007). Internet safety gone wild?: Sacrificing the educational and psychosocial benefits of online social environments. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 575-584.
[65] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
[66] Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481.
[67] Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
[68] Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & Chenzi, C. (2012). Integrating social networking tools into ESL writing classroom: Strengths and weaknesses. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 42-48.