1

The Relationship between English-majored Students’ Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Size

International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS)
© 2024 by IJSMS Journal
Volume-7 Issue-4
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Nguyen Nhut Thanh, Le Trung Kien
DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i4p117
Citation:
MLA Style: Nguyen Nhut Thanh, Le Trung Kien "The Relationship between English-majored Students’ Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Size" International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) V7.I4 (2024):129-139.

APA Style: Nguyen Nhut Thanh, Le Trung Kien, The Relationship between English-majored Students’ Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Size, International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), v7(i4), 129-139.
Abstract:
The aim of the study is to figure out the relationship between morphological awareness and vocabulary size. More specifically, the primary purpose of the current study concerned whether English-majored students’ morphological awareness existed the correlation with their vocabulary size. There were two tests used in this study. The Vocabulary Levels Test was adapted from Al Farsi (2008), cited in the Vocabulary Levels Test (Nation, 2001). The test was to measuring English-majored students’ ability to memorize learned English vocabulary. In terms of a modified version of the Morphological Awareness Test (McBride-Change et al, 2005) was also adapted from Al Farsi (2008), which was used to determine vocabulary size. Besides, Independent Samples Test was run by the software to investigate if there was the difference of the tests’ results between male participants and female participants. Participants in this study were senior English studies majors at Nam Can Tho University. One hundred and seventeen students were chosen at random to participate in this study. The participants varied in age from twenty-two to twenty-six. They were all native speakers of Vietnamese who had studied English as a foreign language for at least 10 years. There were seventy-five female participants and forty-two male participants. They were tested at their university during the second semester of the 2022–2023 school year. The results showed that English-majored students’ morphological awareness at Nam Can Tho University had the average correlation with their vocabulary size. In addition, there was no significant difference between male and female students.
Keywords: Vocabulary Size, Morphological Awareness, English-majored students.
References:
[1] Al Farsi, B. (2008). Morphological awareness and its relationship to vocabulary knowledge and morphological complexity among Omani EFL University students. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
[2] Alsaeedi, W. A. (2017). The role of morphological awareness in vocabulary acquisition in English of Saudi EFL learners.
[3] Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to assess its relation to reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(1), 42-56.
[4] Arnold, R., & Shorey, C. D. (1986). Morphology and morphometry of the rabbit uterus during pseudopregnancy. Cells Tissues Organs, 127(2), 119-124.
[5] Astan, C., & Tamah, S. M. (2015). The correlation between vocabulary size and the reading comprehension of the english education department students. Magister Scientiae, (38), 123-131.
[6] Asyiah, D. N. (2017). THE VOCABULARY TEACHING AND VOCABULARY LEARNING: PERCEPTION, STRATEGIES, AND INFLUENCES ON STUDENTS'VOCABULARY MASTERY. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 9(2), 293-318.
[7] Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2005). A probabilistic interpretation of canonical correlation analysis.
[8] Bai, Z. (2018). An analysis of English vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 849-855.
[9] Booij, G. (2007). Construction morphology and the lexicon. Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, 34-44.
[10] Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension, 78-103.
[11] Danner, H. G. (2014). A thesaurus of English word roots. Rowman & Littlefield.
[12] Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3.
[13] Ellis, M. (2022, November 2). Morphology. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/morphology/
[14] Gayen, A. K. (1951). The frequency distribution of the product-moment correlation coefficient in random samples of any size drawn from non-normal universes. Biometrika, 38(1/2), 219-247.
[15] Gogtay, N. J., & Thatte, U. M. (2017). Principles of correlation analysis. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 65(3), 78-81.
[16] Gu, Y. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-7.
[17] Henrich, V., & Hinrichs, E. (2011, September). Determining immediate constituents of compounds in GermaNet. In Proceedings of the international conference recent advances in natural language processing 2011 (pp. 420-426).
[18] Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[19] Levine, A., & Reves, T. (1990). Does the method of vocabulary presentation make a difference?. TESL Canada Journal, 37-51.
[20] Maag, L. K. (2007). Measuring morphological awareness in adult readers: Implications for vocabulary development (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).
[21] Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge university press.
[22] McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J. R., Shu, H. U. A., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S. F., ... & Leung, K. (2008). What's in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied psycholinguistics, 29(3), 437-462.
[23] McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
[24] Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Vocabulary acquisition research group virtual library, 5(2), 1-11.
[25] Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10, pp. 126-132). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
[26] Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 4(3), 124-132.
[27] Palumbo, A., Kramer-Vida, L., & Hunt, C. V. (2015). Teaching vocabulary and morphology in intermediate grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(2), 109-115.
[28] Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N., Newton, J., & Newton, E. (2011). The Latin–Greek connection: Building vocabulary through morphological study. The Reading Teacher, 65(2), 133-141.
[29] Rugaiyah, R. (2018). Derivational and inflectional morphemes: A morphological analisis. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 5(2), 73-85.
[30] Stageberg N. C., & Oaks D. D. (2000). An introductory English grammar. 5th ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
[31] Sumarni, B. (2020). The relationship between morphological awareness and English vocabulary knowledge of sixth semester students in IKIP Mataram. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 3(2), 109-116.
[32] Tô, M. T. (2003). Giáo trình hình thái học tiếng Anh= English morphology. Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
[33] Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2021). Vocabulary in English language learning, teaching, and testing in Vietnam: A review. Education Sciences, 11(9), 563.
[34] Wero, Y. T., Machmud, K., & Husain, N. (2021). The study on students' vocabulary size. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 22-34.